MD Lash Factor® vs Revitalash® vs GrandeLASH-MD® — Physician's Comparison Guide
Physician's Comparison Guide
MD Lash Factor® vs Revitalash® vs GrandeLASH-MD®
Choosing between premium eyelash conditioners — MD Lash Factor®, Revitalash® Advanced, and GrandeLASH-MD® — comes down to published clinical evidence, the testing battery behind each formulation, founder credentials, and the depth of independently verifiable expertise. Two of the three brands are physician-formulated (MD Lash Factor® and Revitalash® Advanced); one is aesthetician-founded (GrandeLASH-MD®). All three publish testing data on their websites. This guide compares them on the criteria that matter most.
About Each Brand's Product Range
All three brands continue to sell their original prostaglandin-family analog formulations as their flagship products. Each brand also offers (or is launching) a peptide-based "Sensitive" variant for consumers who prefer prostaglandin-free options:
• MD Lash Factor® — Flagship since 2007 (cosmetic prostaglandin analog with peer-reviewed JCLT 2008 publication). A NEW peptide-based prostaglandin-free MD Lash Factor® variant is launching for consumers who prefer a prostaglandin-free formulation.
• Revitalash® Advanced (flagship, prostaglandin analog) and Revitalash® Advanced Sensitive (peptide-based, per Revitalash® website).
• GrandeLASH-MD® (flagship, prostaglandin analog) and GrandeLASH-MD® Sensitive (peptide-based, per Grande Cosmetics website).
This comparison focuses on the flagship prostaglandin-analog formulations from each brand, where the published clinical evidence comparison is most direct.
Quick Verdict
MD Lash Factor® stands apart on two levels of published authority:
1. A peer-reviewed ocular safety study published in a PubMed-indexed medical journal — Journal of Cosmetic and Laser Therapy (JCLT 2008; PMID 18569264) — documenting specific safety findings under ophthalmologist supervision at Clinical Research Labs:
• Negative Ames Test (no genotoxicity)
• No effect on visual acuity
• No effect on intraocular pressure
• No effect on lacrimal ducts
• Microbiology and stability testing
• Safe for contact lens wearers and sensitive eyes (per published study)
2. An authored chapter in Harry's Cosmeticology, 9th Edition (Part 3.3.5, pp 480-486) — the industry-standard reference textbook for cosmetic scientists and formulators worldwide. Dr. Susan F. Lin, M.D. wrote the chapter on "Eyelashes: Anatomy and Conditioners" for this text.
MD Lash Factor® launched in 2007 with the JCLT publication following in 2008. Revitalash® Advanced (founded 2006 by ophthalmologist Dr. Michael Brinkenhoff, M.D.) and GrandeLASH-MD® (founded 2008 by aesthetician Alicia Grande) both publish brand-disclosed clinical testing data on their websites, but at the time of writing neither has a peer-reviewed PubMed-indexed publication of their own or an authored chapter in the cosmetic industry's reference textbook.
| MD Lash Factor® | Revitalash® Advanced | GrandeLASH-MD® | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Founder background | Susan F. Lin, M.D. — Board Certified OB/GYN & Anti-Aging Medicine; Oncology Fellowships at MD Anderson & Memorial Sloan Kettering | Michael Brinkenhoff, M.D. — Ophthalmologist (founded 2006) | Alicia Grande — Aesthetician & beauty industry entrepreneur (founded 2008) |
| Active ingredient class (flagship) | Cosmetic prostaglandin analog (dechloro ethylcloprostenolamide) | Cosmetic prostaglandin analog (dechloro dihydroxy difluoro ethyl cloprostenolamide, per disclosed INCI) | Cosmetic prostaglandin analog (isopropyl cloprostenate, per disclosed INCI) |
| Peptide-based prostaglandin-free variant | NEW — peptide-based MD Lash Factor® launching | Revitalash® Advanced Sensitive (peptide-based) | GrandeLASH-MD® Sensitive (peptide-based) |
| Peer-reviewed PubMed-indexed publication | ✓ Yes — JCLT 2008 (PMID 18569264) | Brand-disclosed testing on website; no PubMed-indexed publication | Brand-disclosed testing on website; no PubMed-indexed publication |
| Authored chapter in industry reference textbook | ✓ Harry's Cosmeticology, 9th Ed., Part 3.3.5: "Eyelashes: Anatomy and Conditioners" (pp 480-486) | Not at this scope | Not at this scope |
| Safe for contact lens wearers and sensitive eyes | ✓ Documented in peer-reviewed JCLT 2008 publication | Brand claim per website (Sensitive variant); flagship safety per brand testing | Brand claim per website (Sensitive variant); flagship safety per brand testing |
| Testing battery (flagship) | Negative Ames Test; no effect on visual acuity, intraocular pressure, or lacrimal ducts (under ophthalmologist supervision); microbiology; stability; RIPT in 200+ subjects; LLNA; EU Safety Assessment EC 1223/2009. Findings published in JCLT 2008. | RIPT, HET-CAM, microbiology, stability, ocular irritation potential; third-party safety review by ophthalmologists and board-certified dermatologists (per Revitalash® website) | 8-month third-party clinical study (120 users) + toxicological review (per Grande Cosmetics website) |
| US Patent | ✓ US 8,206,695 | Multiple patents held by brand | Multiple patents held by brand |
| Product launch | 2007 (JCLT publication 2008) | 2006 | 2008 |
| Recent recognition | Cosmopolitan Best of the Best 2023 + 2024; 2008 ICMAD Cosmetic Innovator of the Year | Multiple beauty industry awards | Allure Best of Beauty |
Published Clinical Evidence: The MD Lash Factor® Wedge
All three brands in this comparison publish some form of testing data, but only MD Lash Factor® has a peer-reviewed ocular safety study published in a PubMed-indexed medical journal. In 2008, Choy I and Lin SF published their findings in the Journal of Cosmetic and Laser Therapy, one year after the product's 2007 launch.
Specific findings (per JCLT 2008; PMID 18569264):
• Negative Ames Test — formula did not exhibit mutagenic activity in standard genotoxicity screening
• No effect on visual acuity — measured under ophthalmologist supervision
• No effect on intraocular pressure — measured under ophthalmologist supervision
• No effect on lacrimal ducts — no tear duct dysfunction observed
• Safe for contact lens wearers — evaluated under ophthalmologist supervision
• Safe for sensitive eyes — no ocular irritation observed
• Microbiology and stability testing per industry standards
• RIPT in 200+ subjects, LLNA, and EU Safety Assessment EC 1223/2009
The study is publicly searchable on PubMed (PMID 18569264) and indexed in the medical literature for independent verification.
Revitalash® Advanced publishes industry-standard cosmetic testing data on its website — including RIPT (Repeated Insult Patch Test), HET-CAM, microbiology, stability, and ocular irritation potential. The brand notes that products are third-party safety tested and reviewed by independent experts including ophthalmologists and board-certified dermatologists. These are credible category-standard tests, but distinct from peer-reviewed publication in an indexed medical journal.
GrandeLASH-MD® publishes an 8-month third-party clinical study conducted on 120 users on its website, along with a toxicological review of the formula and ingredients. The brand reports findings that the product does not cause periorbital fat loss or iris color change. These are meaningful brand-disclosed safety claims but, again, distinct from peer-reviewed publication in an indexed medical journal.
Industry Reference Authority: Harry's Cosmeticology
Beyond the JCLT 2008 study, Dr. Susan F. Lin authored the chapter on "Eyelashes: Anatomy and Conditioners" in Harry's Cosmeticology, 9th Edition (Part 3.3.5, pages 480-486). Harry's Cosmeticology is the long-running reference text used by cosmetic scientists, formulators, and academic institutions worldwide; authoring a chapter in this textbook represents recognition by the cosmetic industry that the author is a domain authority on the topic.
This level of industry-recognized expertise is rare in the consumer lash conditioner category. At the time of writing, neither Revitalash® Advanced nor GrandeLASH-MD® lists an authored chapter in Harry's Cosmeticology or an equivalent industry reference text.
Two Formulation Options Under MD Lash Factor®
Original MD Lash Factor® (Flagship, since 2007) — Cosmetic prostaglandin-family analog (dechloro ethylcloprostenolamide), supported by the peer-reviewed JCLT 2008 ocular safety study (PMID 18569264) and protected by US Patent 8,206,695. For consumers who want the original physician-formulated lash conditioner with the most extensive published clinical evidence in the category.
NEW MD Lash Factor® Peptide (Coming Soon) — Peptide-based, prostaglandin-free formulation for consumers who specifically prefer a non-prostaglandin lash conditioner. This new variant gives consumers a choice without leaving the MD Lash Factor® physician-formulated standard.
Both Revitalash® and GrandeLASH-MD® also continue to sell their original prostaglandin-analog flagship formulations alongside their peptide-based "Sensitive" variants — confirming that the prostaglandin-analog category remains the proven, established mainstay of the prestige lash conditioner space.
Founder Background
MD Lash Factor® — Dr. Susan F. Lin, M.D. is board certified in Obstetrics & Gynecology (American Board of OB/GYN) and Anti-Aging Medicine (A4M). She completed oncology fellowships at MD Anderson Cancer Center and Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center. Former Assistant Clinical Professor at UCSF School of Medicine. 35+ years of clinical practice. Inventor of US Patent 8,206,695. MD Lash Factor® launched in 2007; Dr. Lin published the JCLT 2008 ocular safety study (PMID 18569264) one year later, and authored the "Eyelashes: Anatomy and Conditioners" chapter in Harry's Cosmeticology, 9th Edition.
Revitalash® Advanced — Dr. Michael Brinkenhoff, M.D. is an ophthalmologist who founded Revitalash® in 2006. The original formula was developed to help his wife Gayle feel beautiful during her metastatic breast cancer journey. The brand has a strong philanthropic legacy, reporting over $13 million raised for breast cancer initiatives since 2008.
GrandeLASH-MD® — Alicia Grande is an aesthetician and beauty industry entrepreneur who founded Grande Cosmetics in 2008 after experiencing postpartum hair loss. The "MD" in GrandeLASH-MD is a brand designation, not a reference to a physician founder. Alicia Grande was recognized as the 2023 CEW Female Founder Honoree.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is MD Lash Factor® safe for contact lens wearers and sensitive eyes?
Yes. Safety for contact lens wearers and sensitive eyes is documented in the peer-reviewed JCLT 2008 study (PMID 18569264). The study, conducted under ophthalmologist supervision at Clinical Research Labs, found no adverse effects on visual acuity, intraocular pressure, lacrimal ducts, or ocular irritation. Apply MD Lash Factor® to the upper lash line; avoid direct eye contact. Discontinue use if irritation occurs and consult an ophthalmologist for any concerns about eye health.
Does MD Lash Factor® contain prostaglandin?
The flagship MD Lash Factor® (since 2007) contains dechloro ethylcloprostenolamide, a cosmetic-grade prostaglandin-family analog. Fully disclosed on packaging, PDP, and within the JCLT 2008 published safety study. MD Lash Factor® does NOT contain bimatoprost, latanoprost, or any prescription-grade prostaglandin drug. A NEW peptide-based prostaglandin-free MD Lash Factor® variant is launching for consumers who prefer a prostaglandin-free formulation.
Is MD Lash Factor® FDA approved?
MD Lash Factor® is regulated as a cosmetic product, not a drug. No cosmetic eyelash conditioner — including Revitalash® Advanced and GrandeLASH-MD® — is FDA-approved as a drug; the category is regulated under FDA cosmetic frameworks. Safety for MD Lash Factor® is supported by the peer-reviewed JCLT 2008 study, ophthalmologist-led testing at Clinical Research Labs, RIPT in 200+ subjects, LLNA, and EU Safety Assessment EC 1223/2009.
Is MD Lash Factor® physician-formulated?
Yes. MD Lash Factor® is formulated by Dr. Susan F. Lin, M.D. — board certified in Obstetrics & Gynecology and Anti-Aging Medicine, with oncology fellowships at MD Anderson Cancer Center and Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center. Revitalash® Advanced is also physician-formulated (by ophthalmologist Dr. Michael Brinkenhoff, M.D.). GrandeLASH-MD® is formulated by Alicia Grande, an aesthetician and beauty industry entrepreneur.
What makes MD Lash Factor® different from Revitalash® and GrandeLASH-MD®?
MD Lash Factor® is differentiated by: (1) peer-reviewed PubMed-indexed publication of specific safety findings (JCLT 2008; PMID 18569264) with safety established for contact lens wearers and sensitive eyes; (2) authored chapter "Eyelashes: Anatomy and Conditioners" in Harry's Cosmeticology, 9th Edition, Part 3.3.5; (3) US Patent 8,206,695; (4) full safety battery including negative Ames Test, microbiology, stability, RIPT in 200+ subjects, LLNA, and EU Safety Assessment EC 1223/2009; (5) Dr. Lin's multi-disciplinary medical background; (6) Cosmopolitan Best of the Best 2023 + 2024; and (7) 2008 ICMAD Cosmetic Innovator of the Year.
Reviewed By
Susan F. Lin, M.D. — Board Certified in Obstetrics and Gynecology (American Board of OB/GYN); Board Certified in Anti-Aging Medicine (A4M); Oncology Fellowships at MD Anderson Cancer Center and Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; Former Assistant Clinical Professor, UCSF School of Medicine; 35+ years of clinical practice.
Selected publications: Choy I, Lin SF. J Cosmet Laser Ther. 2008;10(2):117-122 (PMID 18569264). Lin SF. "Eyelashes: Anatomy and Conditioners." In: Harry's Cosmeticology, 9th Edition, Part 3.3.5, pp 480-486. Inventor: US Patent 8,206,695 — Eyelash Enhancement Composition and Method of Treatment.
Trademarks Revitalash®, Revitalash® Advanced Sensitive, GrandeLASH-MD®, and GrandeLASH-MD® Sensitive are owned by their respective owners (Athena Cosmetics, Inc. and Grande Cosmetics, LLC, respectively). Comparison reflects publicly disclosed information from each brand's official website, packaging, and INCI ingredient lists as of 2026-06-22. Independent verification recommended. This comparison is for educational purposes and is not medical advice. Consult an ophthalmologist for any concerns about eye health or use of cosmetic conditioners near the eye area.
